🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to ban social media access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and families are watching intently to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a rising chorus of nations are considering parallel measures.

• Denmark plans a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM stating that smartphones and apps are "stealing our kids' youth". The policy may be formalized soon.
• Norway is set to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to confirm the user details of social media account holders. Officials have indicated that an similar ban could be "a potential options on the table".
• In Spain, the president has asked parliament to pass a bill increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has adopted a advisory statement calling for a ban for minors without a parent decides otherwise is granted. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" quality of these platforms, the resolution does not create mandatory rules.

"A clear age limit is a useful starting point," stated a leading European lawmaker supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Eye

In the UK, the government has remained open to a potential ban, stating that "no measure is being dismissed" but insisting any action must be "based on conclusive data".

Earlier, support grew behind a legislative effort to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end weakened. Instead, the government committed to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have voiced concerns. An organization established by the family of a young person who was lost after viewing disturbing platform posts suggests that a simple age ban might not make platforms safer and could result in a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to design tools that are secure and fit for minors," said a leading online safety campaigner.

America: A Fragmented Landscape

In the United States, regulation is mostly occurring at the local level against a backdrop of federal inaction.

• Utah mandates adult approval for minors to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a law prohibiting those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has passed a rule restricting teenagers to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra access requiring a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed measures demanding adult authorization for under-16s to open social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and calls from some figures to follow Australia's path, a US-wide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

Global Perspectives

Apart from these regions, further nations are also considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for one major platform to 16.

But, world organizations adopt a more nuanced tone. Unicef has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "may even backfire". The organization highlights that online platforms can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to prioritize user protection.

As this worldwide debate evolves, the policies of this nation and others demonstrate that policymakers around the world are no longer prepared to wait for platforms to act voluntarily.